Which statement best explains how the author develops the central idea throughout the passage?
The author explains that, even after Trujillo was
killed, her parents continued to fear the dictatorship,
The author explains that the assassination freed her
parents from fear, allowing them to leave the country,
The author explains that, after Trujillo was killed,
her family was able to escape to the United States.
The author explains that, even though Trujillo was
executed, her parents found new reasons to fear
him.

they are direct opposites. they can both be corrupted. they are inseparable.

as we know, the english language is spoken all over the world by native and non-native speakers and has become the most certain tool when it comes to communicating. businesses, schools, even romantic relationships depend on it to keep thriving. in addition, it is the language of the internet not only because most of the content available is in english, but also because people prefer to use it when talking to others, since it's the language everyone supposedly learns.

yet, there have been some current claims that chinese will soon take over as the most important language in the world. china's magnitude has never been more evident and doing business with the chinese is a gold mine for any country. we now see language schools offering chinese courses as commonly as english.

however - even though we cannot deny china's importance and the advantage it is when someone takes the time to learn the language their business contact speaks-, people in general seem to be ignoring the aspects that seem to keep english as the chosen one of languages. one of them has been mentioned above: it is the language of the internet. also, chinese people are still learning english, since it opens doors in communicating with practically everyone else, from every single country.

note: if this is not the sort of transition you need, let me know. : d

argumentative i feel like this best match it but it could judgmental to