subject
English, 28.10.2020 23:40 nadiarose6345

What should you consider when evaluating the credibility of a piece of literature based on voice and the choice of a narrator?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 01:00
Read the passage from animal farm. "that was part of the arrangement! " cried squealer. "jones's shot only grazed him. i could show you this in his own writing, if you were able to read it. the plot was for snowball, at the critical moment, to give the signal for flight and leave the field to the enemy. and he very nearly succeeded—i will even say, comrades, he would have succeeded if it had not been for our heroic leader, comrade napoleon. do you not remember how, just at the moment when jones and his men had got inside the yard, snowball suddenly turned and fled, and many animals followed him? and do you not remember, too, that it was just at that moment, when panic was spreading and all seemed lost, that comrade napoleon sprang forward with a cry of 'death to humanity! ' and sank his teeth in jones's leg? surely you remember that, comrades? " exclaimed squealer, frisking from side to side. now when squealer described the scene so graphically, it seemed to the animals that they did remember it. at any rate, they remembered that at the critical moment of the battle snowball had turned to flee. but boxer was still a little uneasy. how does the characterization of squealer support the author’s purpose? squealer's dramatic accusations draw parallels between him and stalin’s propagandists. squealer's uncertainty shows that he is not a reliable ally of napoleon and is ineffective with messaging. squealer's ability to get the animals to listen to him shows that any animal can rise to be a leader in time. squealer's humble interactions with the animals reflect the importance of equality and cooperation.
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 10:30
Read the excerpt from "object lesson, part 2." "no sign of the original envelope? " "no." "i found two boys with bills — in each case a single, too. david strager and joey buell. no envelope." louise's brows met. ellery glanced up at the clock. 9: 07. he strolled over to her. "don't show them you're worried. there's nothing to worry about. we have twenty-eight minutes." he raised his voice, smiling. which statement explains the inference ellery makes and why he makes it? he infers that miss carpenter thinks they are not going to find the thief because he sees her facial expression. he infers that it will take twenty-eight more minutes to find the missing money because that is all the time he has. he infers that the original envelope will not be found because neither david strager nor joey buell has it. he infers that david strager and joey buell took the money because they each have a dollar bill.
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 11:30
Answer to write a compare and contrast analysis of how “broke chain” and fish cheeks both address a common theme about belonging
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 16:30
Explain the difference between narration and point of view. narration tells a story whereas point of view is the angle from which the story is told. narration and point of view are the same so there is no difference. narration is the story itself, and the point of view is the narrator's character in relation to the story being told. narration is the speaker and point of view is the message of the story.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
What should you consider when evaluating the credibility of a piece of literature based on voice and...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 03.05.2021 18:10
question
Mathematics, 03.05.2021 18:10
question
Mathematics, 03.05.2021 18:10
Questions on the website: 13722360