How is an article written 50 years after an event different from an article written one year after the event?

It can reflect on the long-term impact of the event.

It can summarize the details of the event chronologically.

It can show the immediate reactions of the people involved.

It can provide lots of specific details about the event.

It can reflect on the long-term impact of the event.

Explanation:

An article that is written so long after an event happened, is able to show the long term effects of the event because it would be able to include events that happened in the 50 years after the event in question has happened.

An article written only a year afterwards however, will be unable to talk about the long term impact of the event and will be more focused on the relatively immediate impacts of the event.

For instance, an article about the Civil Rights Act written in 1965 would be unable to talk about the long term impact of the Act as opposed to an article written in 2014 that will show such for instance how Southern States fought the Act.

now, of course, the quality and the seasonability of these winter dreams varied, but the stuff of them remained.   they persuaded dexter several years later to pass up a business course at the state university—his father, prospering now, would have paid his way—for the precarious advantage of attending an older and more famous university in the east, where he was bothered by his scanty funds. but do not get the impression, because his winter dreams happened to be concerned at first with musings on the rich, that there was anything merely snobbish in the boy. he wanted not association with glittering things and glittering people—he wanted the glittering things themselves. often he reached out for the best without knowing why he wanted it—and sometimes he ran up against the mysterious denials and prohibitions in which life indulges.

there you go thats what we are missing

can you provide the possible answers