samar and leyte exeperienced extreme debacle due to typhoon yolanda which was somehow similar to the disasterxperienced by quezon brought by typhoon glenda.

in "people in peace, not profit and war" chrisholm uses inductive reasoning for her argument against defense spending by stating that the new administration, like most americans, wanted to invest in social objectives, so they must not want to prioritize defense spending. mr. nixon said "we can delay no longer in launching new approaches to the problem that beset them", but chrisholm points out that the programs were delayed anyways.

explanation:

the answer to your question is d because the clause conveys the tone of the man in the excerpt, which is arrogant and cocky. hope that .

they are direct opposites. they can both be corrupted. they are inseparable.