Which statement best describes the role that the third- person-omniscient point of view plays in this excerpt?
Read this excerpt from The Call of the Wild.
The drivers confidently expected a long stopover.
Themselves, they had covered twelve hundred miles
with two days' rest, and in the nature of reason and
common justice they deserved an interval of loafing. But
so many were the men who had rushed into the
Klondike, and so many were the sweethearts, wives,
and kin that had not rushed in, that the congested mail
was taking on Alpine proportions; also, there were official
orders.
O It provides important historical details that readers
would not get if Buck narrated the story.
Olt gives information about how far sled-dog teams
traveled that readers would not know if one of the men
narrated the story
It gives reasons for why the dogs and men are so
exhausted that readers may not understand if Buck
narrated the story.
O It provides important details about story events that
readers would not get if one of the men narrated the
story.

step-by-step explanation:

hello!

(x,y)=(150,300)

300 adult tickers were sold!

good luck!

"character is what you are in the dark." dwight lyman moody, in this very witty quotation of his, states we act and think differently when we are "in the dark", that is, when the spotlight is not on us and everyone can see us and consequently judge us. when reading, we tend to be sympathetic to some characters and their dilemmas. by being so, we are saying to ourselves that we agree with those characters' acts and choices, even if they are morally questionable if we have common sense in mind. dwight lyman moody's quotation applies very well to "crime and punishment", by   19th century russian writer fiodor dostoyevsky. raskolnikov, the main character, a former law student who spends his days reflecting upon life and its misery, draws a fatal conclusion: mankind is divided in two main categories: ordinary and extraordinary people. the first are the ones who lead a run-of-the-mill existence and are full of imperfections; the latter are the ones who are spiritually superior, the ones who always know better, and have the right to judge the ordinary ones, as well as eliminate them if for common good. raskolnikov considers himself as belonging to the extraordinary category and decides to kill an old lady who is a money lender and in whose house he rents a small room. raskolnikov compares himself to napoleon, who had the undeniable right to execute tons of people during the war in order to save his nation. of course what the main character decides to do is a horrendous crime, but as readers we feel it is the right thing for him to do, since the victim is a mean old woman who only thinks about money and keeps humiliating her younger sister. what one experiences is a mixture of sympathy and empathy for the character, even though he decides to commit homicide, which is not at all accepted or tolerated by civilized citizens. however, since readers are "in the dark", they allow themselves to feel in ways they would probably never dare to confess to anyone, no matter how nasty or vicious a character can be. after all, they are just reading and doing no harm. in other words, readers are in the dark and can be who they are without being judged.