Which of the events solve the main problem? Problem: The miller needs a job and worries about people's opinion of him.

Solution 1: The miller is employed at a mill and is worried that his anti-milling family & friend(s) might disapprove with his career choice(s).

Solution 2: The anti-miller is boycotting mills with his anti-milling family, friend(s) and/or coworker(s). This demonstrates his obvious lack of care for pro-miller’s opinion(s) of him while showing the opposite to the anti-millers. Consequently, his strong opposition towards mills won’t allow him to work at one and he’s now unemployed in a coincidentally mill-dominant city.

Solution 3: The miller is employed at a mill and is therefore highly regarded by his pro-milling family/friend(s)/coworkers.

Solution 4: The closeted anti-miller has no choice but to work at a mill due to his lack of self respect and untimely need for funds. The anti-miller’s choice(s) have begun to bring him a great deal of negativity from those whom know of his hidden anti-mill views. He’s unconfident in himself now that he’s essentially living a lie. His coworkers unknowingly, and rightfully so, add to his turmoil with their pro-mill commentary.

Solution 5: Everything and anything having to do with mills and milling is wiped from existence in it’s entirety. (This solution leaves you with no mill-related problem to have ever occurred and doesn’t give chance to any mill-related problem to happen.)

what are the choses?