Why is summarizing a position back to the person you're arguing with an effective way to understand nuances? How might doing this help you to understand someone else's logic?

One should first ask what is the intent of the argument whether it is about facts, something meaningful or if it is useful.

Explanation:

When arguing with someone, it is important to understand the purpose of the argument. One should first ask what is the intent of the argument whether it is about facts, something meaningful or if it is useful. This can be done by summarizing a position back to the person you are arguing with. It will help you understand where the nuances occur between you and the other person.

Taking this step might help one to understand someone else's logic because it helps you understand the intent of the other person's argument. Through this, one get to understand if the other person is arguing for facts' sake, personal opinion or something useful to them.

the author is intending to draw attention to the plight of refugees, editorial and biography support this. both workpieces make the reader empathize with enrique as well as with the other young migrants from central america. the writer, however, is using a different approach to each text.

the editorial includes strong words to persuade readers. he is trying hard to convince readers in the us to change its refugee approach.

the biography relies on narrative techniques and figurative language which the writer uses wisely in the setting, characterization, and personification to educate readers on the topic.

hello! : )

i’m i haven’t read that. also you can’t really expect someone to write it for you. use your own knowledge and skill and i am sure you’ll get it!

good luck!

~ destiny ^_^