In the space provided, draft a conclusion. This could be a draft of an actual paper you're working on, or a a practice conclusion for a topic of your choice.

"The epic television arrangement known as "Hercules: The Amazing Adventures," is the best begin during the time spent learning Roman and Greek folklore. It has numerous distinctions with the first legend however is reasonable for understudies. Understudies must remember 3 noteworthy contrasts. Hercules was not joined by Atlanta or Daedalus, the creators did not make reference to Perseus who assumed a huge job in the fate of Hercules, and there is additionally no romantic tale between the saint and Mind in the legend. The remainder of the plot mirrors the legend superior to other related shows. The picture of Hercules continues as before well known and perceived through hundreds of years, and it never shows signs of change."

read this passage from the crisis. what rationale is paine using for going to war with great britain? my own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. not all the treasures of the world, so far as i believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for i think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his absolute will, am i to suffer it? what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? if we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other.

it is waged war against an army of countrymen

it would lead to independence from britain

it would be an offensive war

it would be a defensive war