Please help Text: but more important by far is the abundant testimony about Conrad’s savage’s which we could gather if we were so inclined from other sources and which might lead us to think that these people must have had other occupations besides merging into the evil forest or materializing out of it simply to plague Marlowe and his dispirited band. For as it happened ,soon after Conrad had written his book an event of far greater consequences was taking place in the art world of Europe. This is how Frank Willet ,a British art historian describes it:

Gauguin has gone to Tahiti the most extravagant individual act of turning to a non-European culture in the decades immediately before and after 1900, when Europeans artists were avid for new artistic experiences, but it was only about 1904-5 that African art began to make its distinctive impact. one piece is still identifiable; it is a mask that has been given to Maurice Vlaminck in 1905. He records that Derain was “speechless” and “stunned” when he saw it, bought it from Vlaminck and it showed it to Picasso and Matisse, who were also greatly affected by it. Ambroise Vollard then borrowed it and had it cast in bronze...Th revolution of twentieth century art under way! The mask in question was made by other savages living just north of Conrad’s River Congo. They have a name too: the fang people, and are without a doubt among the worlds greatest masters of the sculptured form. The event Frank Willet is referring to marked the beginning of cubism and the infusion of new life into European art that had run completely out of strength.
The point of all of this is to suggest Conrad’s picture of the people’s of the Congo seems grossly inadequate even at the height of their subjection to the ravages of King Leopolds International Association for the Civilazation of Central America.

QUESTIONS:
What claim does Achebe make in this passage?
A: Conrad’s depiction of Africans Is not accurate
B: Willets depiction of African culture is fair
C: Conrad and Willet both dehumanize Africans

What type of evidence does Achebe use to support this claim?
A: anecdotal
B: textual
C: historical

How does the evidence support the claim?
A: it contrasts Conrad’s limited viewpoint
B: it’s supports Conrad‘s perspective
C: it’s denies claims that Conrad is racist