Through the evidence in the excerpt above, what is not implied by the author? Many immigrants have witnessed colonialism, technology, education, liberation, civil war, and uprooting before and during their time in America. Immigrants often have to change and become new people when they move to America. She cares deeply about the experiences of immigrants around her. Immigrants often take jobs that others do not want.

"Immigrants often take jobs that others do not want."

Explanation:

The statement "Many immigrants have witnessed colonialism, technology, education, liberation, civil war, and uprooting before and during their time in America" is implied, because the author strictly says immigrants have witnessed many happenings that are historically relevant, stating colonialism, technology, education, liberation, civil war, uprooting as some of those.

The statement “Immigrants often have to change and become new people when they move to America” is implied in the text as the author explains immigrants had to take new identities and leave their old ones behind in order to be considered parts of the society.

We can also see that “She cares deeply about the experiences of immigrants around her,” statement is implied by the text since the author talks about immigrants and their experiences in a deeply emotional way. The author explains how they hid their scars, how they went through a lot, how they are the hidden figures of history.

The only thing that has not been implied in the text is the statement “Immigrants often take jobs that others do not want”. The Author does mention that immigrants sell the newspaper and clean your offices, but she does not write how no one wanted those jobs – she only says immigants were the ones doing it.

i think it's either 'to expose the corruption of the communists in russia', or 'to criticize animal brutality by communists in russia.'  

hope this ! : )