Read the sentence. From the moment he announced his candidacy for political office, Santiago knew he wanted his campaign to promote pluralism and tolerance.

Which option most accurately explains what Santiago might do to support this goal if he is elected?

He might draft a proposal for each major church to build their own recreation center.

He might encourage his voting base to attend rallies and fundraisers.

He might work with local high schools to create additional extracurricular programs.

He might seek input from a variety of community leaders to establish common goals and interests.

He might seek input from a variety of community leaders to establish common goals and interests.

Explanation:

The second one makes absolutely no sense

That leaves the third and the fourth and the first.

Pluralism is when two or more groups exist.

Tolerance is the ability to tolerate something

To tolerate is to allow the existence of.

This means that Santiago is going to promote either more than one group or groups that have more than one group, and probably something about racism or differentials. The third one supports pluralism, and a little bit of tolerance. The last one includes both. The first one includes both as well. The third one isn’t the answer.

The first and last are left. Let’s look at the situation:

After Santiago is running for a political office, he wanted to promote pluralism and tolerance.

If Santiago seeks input from a variety of community leaders, he is making his goal.

If Santiago drafts a proposal for each major church, he may not be making his goal.

Therefore, the last answer is the most sensible one.

I hope this answer is correct and helps you ;)

the theme of a story can be applied to

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!

pulling in the reader is important