( Don't Respond If You Can't Help)."Directions: " Short Story" The story may be based on real life, or completely made up, or anywhere in between. They may be ideas you think of on the spot or ones you've thought of before but never written about. Steps to take: Exposition, Complicating Incident, Rising Action, Climax, Falling Action, plot, Introduction, Main character, Second character, Third character ( optional). " Here's my story that I wrote so far: (Ounce upon a time their was a girl living in a cabin in the woods. She lived there with her grandmother and she loved the woods. Her name is Melody, and it suited her perfectly. Melody loved animals and nature. Most of her days and nights Melody spent them wondering around in the woods watching the animals. Melody grandmother she was getting older and couldn't do much by herself anymore. The second day Melody day Melody went into town to get some food and supplies that her and grandmother needed. It was a very lovely day, but then after awhile she noticed some Storm clouds were heading in. Normally Melody loves the rain until after she got home. Melody went into a store and bought some food and a first aid kit, because when you are running around in the woods you might get hurt. On her way back home Melody walked around the corner and there was a momma deer and baby deer and she come to a stop. The deers were looking at her and she was looking at them for a few minutes Melody was overcome with excitement. She has only seen a buck before. Melody was thinking to her self that they were beautiful deers. The mama and baby deer started running to get away and then Melody started running after them, she couldn't catch up with the deers they were way to fast for her. She ended up running into a beautiful pond with fish and frogs in the pond. The pond had beautiful flowers, and lots of beautiful wildlife trees, animals and different kinds of plants. The baby deer ended up getting a scratch from one of the plants so, she tried to help the deer but it wouldn't let her at first. But then eventually she was able to help the baby deer with his scratch. Then Melody ran home to put the groceries away and sat down and told her grandmother about her amazing adventure that she had experienced). Will Mark Brainliest. ( Can you rewrite out the story and add more to it. Has to been 500 words and I only have "337 words"and can't think of what else to write. And add all the correct punctuation marks.

answer: idk

explanation:

1)john .f kennedy,

2) f

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this