Sergei considers the goldfish to be his friend. what details in the story reveal their conflict with each other? can their relationship truly be called a friendship?

According to the story.

the details that reveal their conflict are that there is no such relationship because Sergei is the only one that values the fish as a friend, while the fish doesn't do the same with him

Their relationship can't be called a friendship because the goldfish doesn't want to stay with Sergei and Sergei can't land another relationship with someone else to value it as a sane relationship.

Explanation:

All right, first of all, this story captures the science of a dependent relationship. Because first of all, Sergei can't land relationships with someone else making it impossible to be able to build a real friendship. Second, the fish wants to leave and doesn't want to stay to help Sergei with his problems. So, it is not a friendship.

can you show me the drop down menu? ill answer it after you've done that. ill edit this i mean promise

explanation:

today we'd use social media to quickly spread a controversial idea, but in the eighteenth century, the printed pamphlet was highly effective. and thomas paine took full advantage of it. on january 9, 1776, when paine published his pamphlet, "common sense," he wanted to push the american people toward independence from britain. it ultimately ignite the american revolution. thomas paine argued that the monarchy was evil and should be rejected as a form of government. to underscore his point, he cited the bible to argue his case -- in judges 8: 22-23: "the israelites said to gideon, 'rule over us, you and your son and your ' gideon told them, 'i will not rule over you. the lord will rule over you'" (nrsv).