"Come out!" His command was harsh and abrupt above the murmur of the drive. It seemed he could hear the whisper of a furtive movement inside the closet, then nothing. He visualized the stowaway cowering closer into one corner,
suddenly worried by the possible consequences of his act and his self-assurance evaporating,
"I said out!
He heard the stowaway move to obey and he waited with his eyes alert on the door and his hand near the blaster at his side.
Of which conflict is this an example?
1.Man vs. Man
2.Man vs Society
3.Man vs Nature
4.Man vs. Self

answer: the first one

explanation:

explicitly is defined as “in a clear and detailed manner, leaving no room for confusion or doubt.” the rest are interpretive and not clearly proven leaving in fact possible “confusion or doubt” which explicitly, by definition cannot have.

question: which statement best describes a similarity in purpose between the frames and excerpt?

answer: both inform the reader that faryad and liaqat were not given the chance to tell their version of events at the police station

explanation: so as you see they were told to leave before they could tell there story

question answered by

(jacemorris)