Pedro is writing an essay arguing that students should be taught proper nutrition in school. Which claim is most effective for his argument? Proper nutrition is essential to healthy growth and development, so it is a life skill that students should learn in school. Some students don’t know which foods are the healthiest, so school would be the ideal place to learn proper nutrition. Most students are taught about healthy eating at home, but for those who are not, they should learn about it in school. Eating healthy is important for students because it promotes healthy growth and development throughout one’s lifetime.

I'd say the last one. "Eating healthy is important for students because it promotes healthy growth and development throughout one's lifetime."

A)Proper nutrition is essential to healthy growth and development, so it is a life skill that students should learn in school.

Explanation:

just took the test.

based on the biblical principle proverbs 16: 32, i agree with the author of the passage "better is it that it takes longer to be angry than the strong " to the extent that i share the philosophy that the nobility of heart demonstrates the strength of a person. those who are very proud, get angry easily and show their anger toward others are really weak, but those who are noble and do not constantly obfuscate or contain their feelings of anger, are strong people

yes they most likly are and have planed t try to bring human life and supplies there also(due to global warming and other harmful resorces)