Question 1 Part A Which statement is a central idea in Chapter 6 of Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass? Education is liberating. All slaveholders are kind at first, but later grow to be cruel. Some slaveholders view enslaved people as their equals. Violence is sometimes justified. Question 2 Part B Which two statements from the text best support the answer in Part A? “...and the argument which he so warmly urged, against my learning to read, only served to inspire me with a desire and determination to learn.” "Mistress, in teaching me the alphabet, had given me the inch, and no precaution could prevent me from taking the ell." “And of all the mangled and emaciated creatures I ever looked upon, these two were the most so. His heart must be harder than stone, that could look upon these unmoved.” “Few are willing to incur the odium attaching to the reputation of being a cruel master; and above all things, they would not be known as not giving a slave enough to eat.” “That cheerful eye, under the influence of slavery, soon became red with rage; that voice, made all of sweet accord, changed to one of harsh and horrid discord.”

Part A: Education is liberating

Part B: “...and the argument which he so warmly urged, against my learning to read, only served to inspire me with a desire and determination to learn.” // "Mistress, in teaching me the alphabet, had given me the inch, and no precaution could prevent me from taking the ell."

Explanation:

In chapter 6 of "Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass" the author tells the story of the day when his Mistress tried to teach him to read, but her husband forbade her to continue teaching him. According to her husband, teaching a slave to read would take away his servile nature and put him in a privileged position where he would no longer be able to serve whites.

At that moment, Douglass understood that reading would be the essential to get him out of that life. In other words, Douglass shows that this event left him motivated to learn to read, because he managed to understand that education is liberating.

one time i was sleeping on a bench outside of walgreens and someone offered me money because they thought i was homeless

explanation:

formal arguments

in written, formal arguments, the best way to build credibility with readers is to provide them with evidence. no matter what your argument might be and which side you agree with, citing strong evidence to back up your claim leaves the opposition with little to argue.

emotional appeal is often used in oral arguments. written arguments, however, rely on four main types of evidence. as you read further, you will see that some types are more credible than others and "hold more water" so to speak.

statistical evidence

the strongest type of evidence in formal writing is statistical evidence. this ranges from true, hard data presented as a percentage or number, to survey-type data. for example, statistical evidence could be:

4 out of 5 experts claim

85% of women in the united

7 members were present

statistical evidence can be proven as fact. you can actually go out and find hard information to prove your particular claim.

testimonial evidence

the use of celebrities as credibility evidence can be considered testimonial in nature. many people look up to celebrities as role models in their lives. good or bad, when a person chooses a life-path that takes them into public light, there will be many others out there who want to emulate the celebrity. these celebrity endorsements provide the second-strongest type of evidence found in formal arguments.

testimonial evidence can also be collected from experts and authorities in a given field. doctors, dentists, lawyers often provide expert testimonials. their authority is not often questions. they are expected to "know their stuff."

anecdotal evidence

when storytelling is involved as evidence, anecdotal evidence is being used. due to its less objective nature, anecdotal evidence is not extremely strong. when coupled with statistical or testimonial evidence, anecdotal evidence can be highly effective in determining credibility or proof.

storytelling, although based on fact, can include quite a bit of opinion, thus making it less objective. usually, eyewitnesses are used as providers of anecdotal evidence. they saw or experienced the phenomenon at hand are telling their version or side of the story.

analogical evidence

when information is scarce about something and little is known, analogical evidence is often used in a formal argument to increase credibility of the proof. if the phenomenon in question is new and little is known about it, analogical evidence that pulls in known factors about a similar phenomenon to show parallels can be an effective way to provide proof.

due to limited knowledge about the phenomenon, in this situation, analogical evidence can be regarded as the weakest type of evidence used in formal arguments. one can only imagine and hope that the comparison-phenomenon is close enough that the results can be applied to the new phenomenon.

in the

all that really matters in a formal argument is whether or not the writer has credible evidence to back up what they want to say or what they are thinking. so often, we hear people say, "prove it! " to one another.

one last little formal arguments not only provide credible evidence to support claims, don't forget that acknowledgment of the opposing point of view in an argument also strengthens the entire product.