Is Colin's evidence relevant to his claim? Yes, because he gives evidence that flying drones is a sport. Yes, because it is on the subject of people owning and flying drones. No, because he only gives his own opinion rather than providing evidence. No, because it is about flying drones being a sport, not about privacy issues.

No, because it is about flying drones being a sport, not about privacy issues.

Explanation:

The argument presented by Colin in the passage does not provide relevant evidence to his claim. It is because the passage is more about flying drones as a sports and not about privacy issues.

In the passage, Colin began his argument by stating that people complaint that flying drones intrude their privacy and claims that instead it should be declared a sport. Colin's argument does not match with his claim.

So, the correct answer is the last option.

answer: he would chuck as much wood as he could chuck if he could chuck wood with a wood chuck

osaka, a gorgeous place to live, extraordinary sights, and a wonderful place to visit for vacation. watching nature change there it is a lovely experience i would like.

explanation:

i ain't gonna write your whole essay for you at least you have a starter

sorry i ain't gonna do the whole assignment for your class or whatever