The three pillars of rhetorical appeals/strategies are: a. pathos, ethos, logos
b. inductive reasoning; deductive reasoning; enthymemes
c. fact; definition; quality
d. deliberative; judicial or forensic; epideictic

the answer is a).

faulty parallelism is a construction in which two or more parts of a sentence are equivalent in meaning but not grammatically similar in form.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

the problem is the last sentence, the first two have a basic subject+verb+object structure.

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in all three sentences:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

one reason summer auggie is because she is kind, and the whole "boy war" between jack will and julian was probaly thinking her to be on auggies sode and if you read auggie and me,   she was nice to auggie because julian was mean and auggie needed some freinds. hope this

- "these rights are natural and god-given to all men equally." (i disagree cuz i kind of think it's 'a' but who knows.)