How do humans understand the world in terms of themselves?Do you think this is egotistical? Why are why not? Cite examples from the text, your own experience, and other literature, art, or history in your answer. the articles is https://www. npr. org/sections/13.7/2016/08/01/488228 453/the-selective-laziness-of-human -reasoning#:~:text=Live%20Sessions- ,The%20Selective%20Laziness%20Of%20 Human%20Reasoning%20%3A%2013.7%3A%2 0Cosmos%20And%20Culture, of%20those%20we%20produce%20ourselv es.

yes it is like you know me bro

< > answer < >

multiple settings

< > reasoning \ evidence < >

novels have multiple settings. a setting is a place or surrounding when a main event or event takes place. not everything happens in just one scene or setting. yes, there can be one *main* setting, but there is definitely not just one. b is incorrect. novels do not have limited characters. there are many characters in a novel, depending on how many the writer wishes to add in. c is incorrect. there is not just a single theme. there are many themes. another word for "theme" is the subject. there can be many subjects and topics. once again, there are many, depending on however many the author wishes to add or include. d is incorrect. yes, novels *can* have no solutions, based on what the author would like. but typically, novels have a solution. the solution might be in "book 5", but there is normally still a solution.

< > eclipsed < >

sentence lenght varies according to word choice.you select which word to use and that will require to use other expressions that collocate with the word chosen.sentence length will vary   according to the choice of words you make to express your ideas.  

conclusions made on the basis of unstated or stated evidence are called inferences