Which textual evidence from "The Interlopers" supports the conclusion that hatred eventually takes its own revenge? 1 "An idea was slowly forming and growing in his brain, an idea that gained strength every time that he looked across at the man who was fighting so grimly against pain and exhaustion."

2 "'Who are they?' asked Georg quickly, straining his eyes to see what the other would gladly not have seen. 'Wolves.'"

3 "Relief at being alive and exasperation at his captive plight brought a strange medley of pious thank-offerings and sharp curses to Ulrich's lips."

4 "If only on this wild night, in this dark, lone spot, he might come across Georg Znaeym, man to man, with none to witness—that was the wish that was uppermost in his thoughts."

2 "'Who are they?' asked Georg quickly, straining his eyes to see what the other would gladly not have seen. 'Wolves.'"

Explanation:

Option 2 is the correct answer because it is a textual evidence from "The Interlopers" that concludes that hatred eventually takes its own revenge.

"The Interlopers" is a story written by British writer, Hector Hugh Munro (pen name: Saki)

The story tells of two characters, Ulrich von Gradwitz and Georg Znaeym, who were enemies from birth. They were not in good terms.

But a time came when they became grown men, they were determined to end their feud but found themselves in a life-or-death situation. Their reconciliation seem to come late.

beginner

government is strong when they have the ability to persuade those they govern to believe government has enough power to force them or should be forcing them to do government’s will.

when enough of the citizenry do not believe government can force them or should force them to do its bidding, government has lost or will lose its strength and power to coerce.

when enough of the citizenry do believe government can force or should force them to do its bidding, they become passive at the least or actively pro-government and repeat government’s own rhetoric to pass on what they have been persuaded by government’s propaganda.

a true majority isn’t always needed to govern or to stop government. many times all that is needed is a strong minority. if a determined 30% of the population rises up against government in a concerted effort to bring it down, this size minority usually will succeed as long as those actively opposing the minority are less in force than the minority. so if 41% of the population sits at home watching tv rooting for one side or the other, they don’t matter. it’s the active parties who make a difference.

c. in order of atomic number