Drag each tile to the correct location Determine whether each discussion group statement is constructive or disruptive to a discussion.
"I think that point might
be inaccurate based on the
following evidence."
"Obviously, you have no
idea what you're talking
about."
"I agree with the first part
of what you said, but could
you please clarify your
second point?"
"I see what you're saying,
but can we hear what some
others have to say, too?"
"Where in a world did
you even get that idea?"
Constructive
Disruptive

Abroad thesis statement encourages your readers to learn something new. 1) true 2) false

You suspect that this article has left out some facts that might lead the reader to believe that someone else made the star-spangled banner. what is the best way to verify this? by consulting a variety of sources by disregarding the article entirely by writing a letter to the editor of the publication that printed the article by reading various historical accounts by verifying the opinions

Read the passage from a vindication of the rights of woman. that the society is formed in the wisest manner, whose constitution is founded on the nature of man, strikes, in the abstract, every thinking being so forcibly, that it looks like presumption to endeavour to bring forward proofs; though proof must be brought, or the strong hold of prescription will never be forced by reason; yet to urge prescription as an argument to justify the depriving men (or women) of their natural rights, is one of the absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense. does wollstonecraft maintain an objective tone in the passage? yes, because she uses objective language such as “society is formed in the wisest manner.” yes, because she uses objective language such as “it looks like presumption to endeavor.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “though proof must be brought, or the strong hold.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense.”