Which claim do both passages support? Read the two passados from Sugar Changed the world,
The abolitionists were brilliant. They created the most
effective public relations campaign in history, inventing
techniques that we use to this day. When he spoke,
Clarkson brandished whips and handcuffs used on slaves,
he published testimonials from sailors and ship doctors
who described the atrocities and punishments on slave
ships. When Olaudah Eguiano published his memoir, he
educated his readers about the horrors of the slave trade,
And then, when the English began to understand what
slavery really was, Clarkson and others organized what we
would call a boycott of "the blood-sweetened beverage"
Slave labor was valuable because it produced cheap sugar
that everyone wanted to buy. But if people stopped buying
that sugar, the whole slave system would collapse. In the
years leading up to the American Revolution, the women of
New England refused to buy English products and English
tea. The loss of income made London rescind some of the
Abolitionists used powerful speeches and presentations
to engage people and persuade them to join the
abolitionists' cause,
People objected to the cruelty of inwoluntary servitude,
but King George III had economic reasons for ending the
trading of enslaved people,
Most people in England did not care whether thousands
of enslaved people suffered as long as sugar remained
plentiful,
The abolitionists' tremendous efforts showed that
making moral arguments to support political movements
were not successful
Mark this and
Save and Exit
SOFT

Read the passage from animal farm. one sunday morning squealer announced that the hens, who had just come in to lay again, must surrender their eggs. napoleon had accepted, through whymper, a contract for four hundred eggs a week. the price of these would pay for enough grain and meal to keep the farm going till summer came on and conditions were easier. when the hens heard this, they raised a terrible outcry. they had been warned earlier that this sacrifice might be necessary, but had not believed that it would really happen. they were just getting their clutches ready for the spring sitting, and they protested that to take the eggs away now was murder. for the first time since the expulsion of jones, there was something resembling a rebellion. led by three young black minorca pullets, the hens made a determined effort to thwart napoleon's wishes. their method was to fly up to the rafters and there lay their eggs, which smashed to pieces on the floor. napoleon acted swiftly and ruthlessly. he ordered the hens' rations to be stopped, and decreed that any animal giving so much as a grain of corn to a hen should be punished by death. the dogs saw to it that these orders were carried out. for five days the hens held out, then they capitulated and went back to their nesting boxes. nine hens had died in the meantime. their bodies were buried in the orchard, and it was given out that they had died of coccidiosis. whymper heard nothing of this affair, and the eggs were duly delivered, a grocer's van driving up to the farm once a week to take them away. which detail from the passage supports the claim that this is an allegory for the great purge? the hens holding out for five days but capitulating the eggs being delivered to the grocer the protesting hens being intentionally starved coccidiosis spreading on the farm

Hich statement offers the best comparison of the two poems? where have you gone." i am a black woman.

What are the central ideas in anne bradstreets as weary pilgrim, now at rest