How do the passages differ in their ideas about fish farming? A. The author of Passage 1 places emphasis on the effects of fish farming, while
the author of Passage 2 suggests measures to solve the problems associated
with overfishing.

B. The author of Passage 1 believes that fish farming can reduce unemployment,
while the author of Passage 2 believes that fish farming does not help create
enough revenue for fishermen.

c. The author of passage 1 believes fish farming is beneficial to the environment,
while the author of Passage 2 believes fish farming is not the solution to
overfishing

D. The author of Passage 1 highlights the difficulties that rural fishermen face
because of fish farming, while the author of Passage 2 states that fish farming
is the solution to their problems.

The correct answer is C. The author of passage 1 believes fish farming is beneficial to the environment,  while the author of Passage 2 believes fish farming is not the solution to  overfishing

Explanation:

The two passages provide a different about fish farming, which is the practice that involves raising fish rather than capturing them in their natural habitat. In the case of the passage 1, the author proposes fish farming is beneficial because this stops the problem of overfishing, this can be seen in "Fish farming helps humans continue to consume fish while protecting valuable marine resources" that shows fish farming is the way to protect the environment and the populations of fish while benefitting humans.

On the opposite, the author of passage 2 exposes the negative effects of fish farming and in this way shows this is not a solution. This can be seen in "one of the major problems with fish farming is water supply contamination" or in "it also causes destructions to habits" that supports the idea fishing farming does not solve the problems caused by overfishing.

yo mama lolol

explanation:

this question is grammatically incorrect and is illegible to me so i can not answer.