Explain how poverty and affluence can play a role in increasing vulnerability to natural hazards

Poverty and wealth can impact decreasing or expanding weakness to regular dangers on the grounds that, with regards to the entrepreneur world in which we live, cash is an element that ensures admittance to better everyday environments.

In this sense, the more cash individuals have, the more solace they can acquire to carry on with a more secure life. Conversely, the less cash, the more burdens an individual will have.

Accordingly, for instance, normal risks that can contrarily impact individuals lives, for example, the cool environment of urban areas like New York can be stayed away from using cash.

In this sense, a vagrant without cash will presumably experience cold considerably more fiercely than an individual with a steady work and a decent monetary position who can purchase a coat and live in a warmed loft.

By giving positions, the organization could give a trustworthy type of revenue to individuals. This will cause the representatives to get the opportunity to build their reserve funds so they can open up one more business and rehash the course of pay allotment.

For  more information, refer the following link:

link

Poverty and wealth can have a notable influence on reducing or increasing vulnerability to natural hazards because, in the context of the capitalist world in which we live, money is a factor that guarantees access to better living conditions. In this sense, the more money people have, the more comfort they can obtain to live a safer life. In contrast, the less money, the more inconveniences a person will have.

Thus, for example, natural hazards that can negatively influence people's lives (such as the cold climate of cities like New York) can be avoided through the use of money: in this sense, a homeless person without money will probably suffer cold much more brutally than a person with a stable job and a good economic position who can buy a coat and live in a heated apartment.

in my opinion, ap calculus was the most difficult. i often struggled with it a lot. however, i have gotten a lot better.

sentences vary by structure as well as by function. there are compound, complex, and compound-complex sentences.

simple sentence

i like to read.

a simple sentence has one independent clause.

compound sentence

i like to read, and i also like to write.

a compound sentence includes more than one independent clause, connected by a coordinating conjunction (and, but, for, nor, or, so, or yet).

complex sentence

i prefer to read books that are bestsellers.

a complex sentence includes one independent clause and one or more dependent clauses. (a dependent clause is one that cannot stand alone.) types of dependent clauses include relative clauses (i kicked the boy who pinched me), adverb clauses (i am going home now because i have a curfew), and noun clauses (i don't know what to do next).

compound-complex sentence

although i prefer to read current bestsellers, i do like to read old agatha christie mysteries, and i also like some 20th-century science fiction.

compound-complex sentences take a bunch of clauses (multiple independent clauses, and one or more dependent clauses) and toss them together like a salad. although these sentences take practice to write in a grammatically correct fashion, they can hold a tremendous amount of meaning, and are common in academic writing.