A 4. PART B: Which TWO quotes from the text best support the answer to Part A?
"he would be assigned another charity lawyer who would glance at his file and cut a
deal with thinly disguised indifference." (Paragraph 53)
b. "Fresh from law school at the University of Pennsylvania, a 25-year-old in her first job,
she bothered to ask why he did it." (Paragraph 55)
C
d
e
f.
"It was clear to her and to Mr. Fasulo that punishing Mr. Mahes by putting him in jail was
like throwing Br'er Rabbit in the briar patch." (Paragraph 59)
"Mr. Fasulo and Ms. Swarns argued for placement in a halfway house, where he
would have food and counseling." (Paragraph 63)
"We felt that, given his record, it was appropriate to ask for a year,' said Ms.
Thompson, the District Attorney's spokeswoman." (Paragraph 64)
9. "She cannot compete with prison. The food at Rikers is tasty, said Mr. Mahes. For
supper, he had pork chops." (Paragraph 67)

perhaps, jefferson is the best spokesman that speak about american ideals of equality and liberty.

no one should be immune to the law because if there is an existence of someone that is above the law, a true equality would never be achieved

hope this

read more on -

d is the correct answer. it recognizes the authors, allows for royalties to have their fair share of profit, and confirms validity.

when connie willis was 12 years old, her mother died. in january of 2003, willis was interviewed for locus magazine. she recognized that death is a major issue in her writing, specially because the vacuous and appalling things that people tend to say in order to support you when someone you loved dies. what really saved willis was reading. books, literature, are not false. poetry tells the truth (as dickinson said: "tell al the truth but tell it slant"). it's not a escape from reality, but a nigromantic experience where whe can talk to people that exist no more. that's the definition that connie willis gives in her novel "passage": «(literature) it's the people who went before us, tapping out messages from the past, from beyond the grave, trying to tell us about life and death! ». enrique vila-matas has figured out the esence of literary experience when he said in a lecture that he intends to have his revenge against life (and death), because to write (and to read) is a form of living and a way to remember. i like in that sense the idea of not leting anything human to get lost. i feel fiction and poetry as the shapes of an ancient anger. like in the poem from dylan thomas: «do not go gentle into that good night / rage, rage against the dying of the light».

but there is another aspect that i have learned from connie willis's quote. in his famous work "danubio", the italian writer claudio magris describes literature as house removals. some messages reach us, other messages get lost in the labyrinth. those messages which are our inheritance teach us how to live and how to die, how to love and how to hate, how to laugh and how to cry. i think that tales really shape us if we listen to them. maybe through the stories we read we learn how to emphatize with others, knowing that the bells tolls for every each of us.