Which of these is not a reason to use the Zone of Proximal Development to reduce misbehaviour?
Y lfa learner can do the work unaided because it is too easy, they are more likely to
misbehave
if a learner cannot do the work even with guidance because it is too hard, they are
more likely to misbehave.
O lfa learner can do the work with guidance because it is at the right level of
challenge, they are less likely to misbehave.
If a learner cannot do the work even with guidance because it is too hard, they are
less likely to misbehave.

The correct answer is D. If a learner cannot do the work even with guidance because it is too hard, they are less likely to misbehave.

Explanation:

In education, the Zone of Proximal development is a concept used to refer abilities a learner is in the process of acquiring, this means, the learner can perform with the assistance of a teacher or similar but not independently. This concept is related to misbehavior because if the learner is asked to complete tasks that are too complex or beyond his zone of proximal development misbehavior might occur. Similarly, if tasks are too easy and do not represent learning or a new challenge misbehavior might occur.

According to this, the statement that is not a reason to use the Zone of Proximal Development to reduce misbehavior is "If a learner cannot do the work even with guidance because it is too hard, they are less likely to misbehave" because when a work or task is beyond the Zone of Proximal Development the learner is more likely to mishave due to frustration to perform the work even with assistance.

"a" because he is appealing to logic as oppose to appealing to the audience's emotions.

yh it is right

explanation: