subject
English, 04.06.2020 14:05 carsonngibbons4354

By President Richard Nixon, April 30, 1973 In 1972, five men from Nixon's administration broke into the Democratic Party's headquarters in the Watergate Hotel. Nixon denied knowledge of the break-in, but in August 1974, evidence became public that he knew about it in advance. He resigned from office four days later.

In recent months, members of my Administration and officials of the Committee for the Re-Election of the President, including some of my closest friends and most trusted aides, have been charged with involvement in what has come to be known as the Watergate affair. These include charges of illegal activity during and preceding the 1972 Presidential election and charges that responsible officials participated in efforts to cover up that illegal activity.
The inevitable result of these charges has been to raise serious questions about the integrity1 of the White House itself. Tonight I wish to address those questions.
Last June 17, while I was in Florida trying to get a few days rest after my visit to Moscow, I first learned from news reports of the Watergate break-in. I was appalled at this senseless, illegal action. And I was shocked to learn that employees of the Re-Election Committee were apparently among those guilty. I immediately ordered an investigation by appropriate Government authorities. On September 15, as you will recall, indictments2 were brought against seven defendants in the case.
As the investigations went forward, I repeatedly asked those conducting the investigation whether there was any reason to believe that members of my Administration were in any way involved. I received repeated assurances that there were not. Because of these continuing reassurances, because I believed the reports I was getting, because I had faith in the persons from whom I was getting them, I discounted3 the stories in the press that appeared to implicate members of my Administration or other officials of the campaign committee.

1. honesty
2. charges for breaking the law
3. disregarded
1
Which statement best highlights the fact that Nixon cannot be objective about Watergate?
A.
The speaker administrates a high office.
B.
The participants include his close friends.
C.
The criminal charges need to be proven.
D.
The events took place in recent months.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 02:10
Which of the following statements would most encourage productive conflict? select all that apply.
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:40
What is the reasoning in this argument?
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 09:30
What can you infer about how the particular events in "the memoirs of the conquistador bernal del diaz de castillo" still affected the writer at the time of writing his memoir? he thinks of his dead crewmen with sadness and regrets that they died for nothing. he is still frustrated that one of his men accidentally kills himself by drinking too much water.  he thinks wistfully about the wealth he may have enjoyed if they had found gold in the yucatan.  he still considers indians liars. 
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 10:30
What is implied in the narrator's discussion of prayer? a) that usen is not concerned about trivial matters b) that prayer is ultimately useless when it comes to a person's well-being. c) that prayer is often used for evil purposes as well as good. d) that usen is the ultimate authority over the petty arguments of men.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
By President Richard Nixon, April 30, 1973 In 1972, five men from Nixon's administration broke into...
Questions
question
Biology, 06.05.2021 15:50
question
Physics, 06.05.2021 15:50
question
Mathematics, 06.05.2021 15:50
question
Mathematics, 06.05.2021 15:50
Questions on the website: 13722367