subject
English, 03.06.2020 01:59 JellalFernandes

In Frankenstein, “what are the two ways in which the narrator changes over the course of the story?

"You are in the wrong," replied the fiend "and instead of threatening, I am content to reason with you. I am malicious because I am miserable. Am I not shunned and hated by all mankind? You, my creator, would tear me to pieces and triumph; remember that, and tell me why I should pity man more than he pities me? This passion is
detrimental to me for you do not reflect that YOU are the cause of its excess. If any being felt emotions of benevolence towards me, I should return them a hundred and a hundredfold; for that one creature's sake I would make peace with the whole kind! What I ask of you is reasonable and
moderate; I demand a creature of another sex, but as hideous as myself; the gratification is small but it is all that I can receive and it shall content me. It is true we shall be monsters cut off from all the world but on that account we shall be more attached to one another. Oh! My creator, make me happy; let me feel gratitude towards you for one benefit!"
I was moved and shuddered when I thought of the possible consequences of my consent but I felt that there was some justice in his argument as his tale and the feelings he now expressed proved him to be a creature of fine sensations and did I not as his maker owe him all the portion of happiness that it was in my power to bestow? He saw my change of feeling and continued,
"I swear to you by the earth which I inhabit and by you that made me, that with the companion you bestow I will quit the neighborhood of man and dwell, as it may chance, in the most savage of places. My evil passions will have fled, for I shall meet with sympathy! My life will flow quietly away and in my dying moments I shall not curse my maker."
His words had a strange effect upon me as I compassionated with him and sometimes felt a wish to console him but when I looked upon him I saw the filthy mass that moved and talked, my heart sickened and my feelings were altered to those of horror and hatred. I tried to stifle these sensations. I paused some time to reflect on all
he had related and the various arguments which he had employed and thought of the promise of virtues which he had displayed on the opening of his existence and the subsequent blight of all kindly feeling by the loathing and scorn which his protectors had manifested towards him. After a long pause of reflection I concluded that the
justice due both to him and my fellow creatures demanded of me that I should comply with his request. Turning to him, therefore, I said,
"I consent to your demand, on your solemn oath to quit Europe forever, and every other place in the neighborhood of man, as soon as I shall deliver into your hands a female who will accompany you in your exile."

A - He is moved by the fiend’s words and develops compassion for him.

B - His feelings of hatred and horror are deepened for the fiend he created.

C - He regrets accepting the fiend’s demand and feels guilty about his actions.

D - He relents to the fiend’s demand and consents to create a female counterpart.

E - He disagrees with the fiend and refuses to accept his demand for a female companion.

Please help

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 23:00
Read the excerpt from a supporting opinion of the supreme court’s ruling in plessy v. ferguson, 1896. laws permitting, and even requiring, their separation in places where they are liable to be brought into contact do not necessarily imply the inferiority of either race to the other, and have been generally, if not universally, recognized as within the competency of the state legislatures in the exercise of their police power. how does this relate to the premises of brown v. board of education? the brown case addresses whether state legislatures are equipped to judge the quality of education offered at segregated schools. the brown case addresses whether authorities believe that one race is inferior to another when creating public schools. the brown case addresses whether these laws inherently deny certain citizens equal protection under the law. the brown case addresses the legality of using police power to monitor public places separated by race.
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 00:30
What's my name? if you know you know
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 09:30
From the life cycle of a plastic bottle, what is the best definition for the word “toxin”?
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 09:30
You will read a story and a prompt. then, you will organize your own story ideas in the narrative organization chart.view the grading rubric as you complete your work. this is your guide to a super submission.read the narrative "grounded."in the narrative organization chart, plan your own story based on this writing prompt.important: save the organizer, immediately, to your computer or drive.you are writing a continuation of the story, “grounded,” so be sure to use some details from this story as you organize your narrative.complete each box on your narrative organization chart.save your work to your computer or drive.submit your work in 03.02 planning your narrative.if you cannot save your chart, you can type the information into a document and submit.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In Frankenstein, “what are the two ways in which the narrator changes over the course of the story?<...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 29.01.2021 19:50
question
Mathematics, 29.01.2021 19:50
question
Mathematics, 29.01.2021 19:50
question
English, 29.01.2021 19:50
Questions on the website: 13722367