Drawing from the text , what is the most conclusive solution offered to regulate , if not solve , this problem of peer pressure? A. Student should be giving choices and how to respond in class B. Parents and teachers should emphasize that the children / students should not care about popularity C. Adults (teachers, parents, etc) should be mindful about how they present choices to students being aware of the presence of others and student privacy D. students should always be allowed to respond to questions or opportunities privately

You forgot to say that this question is about "Students’ Work Ethic Affected by Peer Groups, Desire to Be Popular "by Shankar Vedantam.

A. Student should be giving choices and how to respond in class

Explanation:

The article shows how the relationship with peers can affect students' academic performance. That's because when students establish friendship with people who don't care about academic success, those students are afraid of being seen as a "nerd" and can adopt behaviors that don't help them to be an exemplary student.

On the other hand, students who make friends with people who care about academic success, are afraid that their peers will see him as a "loser" and try harder to be exemplary students.

This all happens due to the concern of these students with the popularity that they have within their groups. For this reason, it is important that teachers give options for students to answer academic questions, without having to expose themselves (raise your hand, or have to answer questions out loud, for example). That way they will feel more comfortable in answering academic questions in classrooms without peer pressure.

read this passage from the crisis. what rationale is paine using for going to war with great britain? my own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. not all the treasures of the world, so far as i believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for i think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his absolute will, am i to suffer it? what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? if we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other.

it is waged war against an army of countrymen

it would lead to independence from britain

it would be an offensive war

it would be a defensive war

artists: xxxtentacion, lil baby, drake, post malone, khalid, bryson tiller, jermih, j. cole, russ, the weeknd, travis scott, kendrik lamar