You would not walk away while someone was talking without saying anything . . . . arrowBoth This habit is hurting relationships and shortening attention spans. arrowBoth Without eye contact, it is nearly impossible to be fully engaged in the conversation. arrowBoth
options:
to state an overall thesis governing
what is argued in the essay

to provide a solution to the problem
of preoccupation with cell phones

to explain how one can strengthen
personal relationships

to inform about the policies that
restaurants have for cell phone use

to present a similar situation
that logically proves the point

to explain why attention to one's
phone can hurt relationships

based on the biblical principle proverbs 16: 32, i agree with the author of the passage "better is it that it takes longer to be angry than the strong " to the extent that i share the philosophy that the nobility of heart demonstrates the strength of a person. those who are very proud, get angry easily and show their anger toward others are really weak, but those who are noble and do not constantly obfuscate or contain their feelings of anger, are strong people

in "people in peace, not profit and war" chrisholm uses inductive reasoning for her argument against defense spending by stating that the new administration, like most americans, wanted to invest in social objectives, so they must not want to prioritize defense spending. mr. nixon said "we can delay no longer in launching new approaches to the problem that beset them", but chrisholm points out that the programs were delayed anyways.

i cannot see any of the options