1. John Dashwood once says of Elinor: "Ah! Elinor…your reasoning is very good, but it is founded on ignorance of human nature." What is ironic about his statement? What is Elinor’s understanding of human nature and how does it compare to everyone else’s?

This statement refers to the novel Sense and Sensibility.

In this novel, we meet Elinor, who is an intelligent woman with a lot of sense and who always uses logic to solve her problems. She is a keen observer of people, and because of this, can be said to know human nature well.

This statement occurs when Elinor and Dashwood find out that Mrs. Ferrars has cut off Edward and considers him dead. Elinor knows that she is an unnatural mother, and that she will not care much for his destiny. John disagrees with this statement. John believes that Elinor is logical, but does not understand human nature. However, this is ironic, as Elinor is the character who best understands human nature, and it is this quality that allows her to judge Mrs. Ferrars character accurately.

The irony is that John Dashwood is accusing Elinor of something that he himself contradicts and does not know.

Elinor's understanding of human nature is related to Mrs. Ferrars' feelings for her son Eduard. Elinor is the one who most understands the nature of Mrs. Ferrars, in relation to the other characters.

Explanation:

The text above refers to the moment when John Dashwood and Elinor are talking about the position of Mrs. Ferrars, in relation to her son, Eduard.

Mrs. Ferrars told Eduard that she does not recognize him as a son and that she will do everything she can to prevent him from succeeding in life. Upon learning of this, John Dashwood states that Mrs. Ferrars will be upset if Eduard marries someone she does not approve of. However, Elinor claims that Mrs. Ferrars' behavior reveals her nature towards her son. According to Elinor, this is a nature of total neglect, so if she doesn't consider him her son, she won't care about anything he does.

At that time John Dashwood does not agree with Elinor and accuses her of reasoning based on ignorance of human nature, while Elinor is correct about her observation.

d. the two authors are in awe of nature; their experiences, reveal that time in nature can change people.

explanation:

i suggest it is anadiplosis