Every inductive argument is
a. based on rules, definitions, and principles
b. a comparison of two sets of events, ideas, and things
c. either invalid or unsound
d. either valid or sound

B). A comparison of two sets of events, ideas, and things.

Explanation:

An inductive argument is demonstrated as the argument that involves a set of evidences regarding something specific to reach a general conclusion that would turn true in future. Such arguments however carry probable chances of the conclusion being true or false even if the premises are true.

As per the question, every inductive argument demonstrates 'a comparison of two sets of events, ideas, and things' through specific examples in order to reach a generalized conclusion or observation which could or could not turn out to be true. Thus, option B is the correct answer.

as you read the passage below, consider how dana gioia uses

evidence, such as facts or examples, to support claims.

reasoning to develop ideas and to connect claims and evidence.

stylistic or persuasive elements, such as word choice or appeals to emotion, to add power to the ideas expressed.

explanation:

i believe that the correct answer is (d) the struggle between tradition and change.

explanation: