Read the excerpt from Maritza's essay, then read the new information she found. Write a paragraph
explaining how she could adjust her response based
on the new information.

Maritza’s response supports school choice for personal freedoms and equal opportunity for all students to get the best education possible. The new information contradicts that position because it gives examples of charter schools that have failed and that are inferior to public schools. Maritza might consider the evidence strong enough to revise her position and rewrite the argument. She might also attempt to explain the evidence and defend her argument in a new paragraph by arguing that the benefits of school choice outweigh the disadvantages.

i think it may be b, i'm not exactly too sure on this. but b seems to make more sense.

chapter i -- paris: september, 1792

a surging, seething, murmuring crowd of beings that are human only in name, for to the eye and ear they seem naught but savage creatures, animated by vile passions and by the lust of vengeance and of hate.

during the greater part of the day the guillotine had been kept busy at its ghastly work: all that france had boasted of in the past centuries, of ancient names, and blue blood, had paid toll to her desire for liberty and for fraternity.

hope this answer you: )!