Read the passage.

[1] Pediatricians who have children of their own take better care of their patients. [2] Being a parent or guardian is a powerful and profound experience. [3] It changes doctors and gives them greater insight. [4] Doctor Stevenson disagrees with my argument. [5] However, his judgment is untrustworthy, since he is not a parent.

What type of logical fallacy is sentence 5?

a false dilemma
begging the question
a professional opinion
an ad hominem attack

1. the details that would clarify the authors purpose for writing would be after the "haley collected used soccer jersey and sent them to guatemalan children." part, he would say, "and you can also donate today to save ". so far in the text, you can see no such thing. if, near the end the author persuades you to donate to guatemalans, then you know that the author's reason to write is to persuade you.

2. what details would make the text more engaging is to see the guatemalan children's reaction to getting free jerseys.

3. the details that convey the author's attitude would be an opinion by the author, for example, if he said, "haley was a very nice girl " or, you can find the attitude by finding parts of haley's personality that he highlights. you can strengthen your tones by using more descriptive words, and simplify long sentences as much as you can.

you're welcome ; p

i believe the answer is d