“His old life in Berlin seemed like a very distant memory now and he could hardly even remember what Karl, Daniel, or Martin looked like, except for the fact that one of them was a ginger.” Bruno has never before mentioned any physical differences in his best friends. Why might he suddenly be classifying his friends in this way now after living at “Out-With?”

Did not take responsibility for his speech.

Explanation:

As per the given description, the response given by Daniel to defend the structural organization of his speech reflect that he 'did not take the responsibility for his speech' which may affect his credibility as the speaker and lessen the impact of the speech. In order to be an efficient speaker, it is always advised that no matter what content one presents, he/she is supposed to take the sole responsibility of it which not only reflects your confidence and skills(in your research) but also helps enhance his reliability(as a speaker) as well as his claim and persuade the audience more conveniently. Thus, it reflects that 'he didn't take responsibility for his speech'.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

is it "means of nourishment"