Why the author of “To Build a Fire” chose to have no dialogue?

In the story "To Build a Fire," London tells the story of a man who dies in the Arctic. However, it is important to note that the man in question does not have a name, nor is there any dialogue associated with his character.

There are two main reasons why the author most likely decided to create the character in this way. First, such a lack of development allows the man to remain anonymous. Therefore, the reader understands that this is the story of many men who died in similar ways. It allows the character to stand for a variety of men in similar circumstances.

The second reason is that it contributes to highlighting the insignificance of the man. By not giving the man a name or dialogue, the author is able to minimize the importance of the man, and thus make the power of the surrounding nature all the more important and impressive.

either a donut or a sphere or a pancake or a flat sphere. it depends on where the vertical line is.

if the line goes through the center of the circle and is perpendicular to a diameter containing the center, then you get a flat circle.

if the line and the diameter of a the circle meet in the center of the diameter and at an angle, you get a pancake.

if the line is on the circumference of the circle and is at right angles   to the circle you get a ring.

if the line contains the diameter, you get a sphere.

the the line is parallel to the diameter and touches the circumference, you get a donut.

i feel like it is actually b.