Please help. I’ll mark you as brainliest if correct .

Read the pair of items and decide what type of error in reasoning it illustrates.

False comparison is the correct answer

In the first scenario, the writer assumes that the way punishments we're executed in the past are similar to how they are done today

In the second scenario, the writer falsely assumes that children are similar to flowers.

B

Explanation:

Two completely different scenarios are being compared in both sentences. A child is being compared to a flower, and the past is being compared to the present, but they aren't as similar as the author believes.  A child can't just be fed, and the past had different laws and ethics.

amy tan

explanation:

samuel gompers was an extremely important person in the american labor movement, being him an employee all his life he devoted himself to fight for the rights of his pairs, he believed they all had the right to have better thing and that they all were working for them but the factory workers were greedy, ambitions and socialist people for him who he didn't have a good concept of.

he gave so many speeches and led so many strikes and protest to fight for equality which he considered employers didn't want to accept, so he had an absolutely negative opinion of them.