PLEASE HURRY ASAP

SOURCE 1: Rafters of Nostalgia is a strange movie that I hated from beginning to end. For one, the opening scene is not really a scene at all because the camera just focuses on an old urn resting in the corner of a dusty cottage for a good 10 minutes. No actors, no action, no nothing. Just urn. BORING!

SOURCE 2: Rafters of Nostalgia is a work of quiet genius that defies trends in modern movies. You won't see any explosions or superheroes here. Its opening scene forces the viewer to gaze upon an urn sitting in the corner of a house for an uncomfortable 10 minutes, providing an exhilarating opportunity to question the decreasing attention span of modern life.
Which statement best synthesizes information from both sources?
1 of 3 QUESTIONS
A person who wants a unique movie-watching experience should watch Rafters of Nostalgia.
A person who wants to take a significant other to a movie should avoid Rafters of Nostalgia.
A person who wants to be challenged by a work of genius should watch Rafters of Nostalgia.
A person who wants to actually enjoy going to the movies should avoid Rafters of Nostalgia.

many were disgusted, nauseated and shook their heads with disapproval upon finding out about the recycling of water process. however, they do not seem to understand that this process actually saves water.

although individuals may argue that it is unhealthy, and or unsafe to drink water that is "from toilet to tap" , the water is 100% safe to drink and involves forcing the water across a membrane, which "removes   any impurities, including viruses, pharmaceuticals and dissolved minerals" , according to paul rozin, a psychology professor who studies revulsion.

i agree that that the thought of drinking water that once ran through someones kitchen sink isn't quite appealing, but recycled wastewater is safe to drink. it also saves water. "the city produces nine million gallons a day" claims russell schreiber, the city’s director of public works.

recycled waste water has absolutely no health concerns whatsoever. when wastewater goes into a system, it's absorbed back into the ground. thus, it goes into a sewer system, then goes through a treatment process that removes contaminants before being released. nonetheless, there is no problem in drinking water that has been recycled.

"in drought-ed california, there are six state agencies that use wastewater that comes from an intellectual property source," according to the university of california, riverside. studies show that this water is completely safe to drink, however, it still doesn't mean people are going to happily pour it in a water glass.

researchers hope it "may make consumers more amenable to drinking recycled wastewater," extraordinarily, women who have a higher "disgust reaction" and make most consumer purchasing decisions.

i think the answer is d)solicitude sorry if the answer is wrong.

the answer is c. he is an efficient leader who prompts his crew to work quickly .

explanation: