Read the excerpt from "What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?"
Must I argue the wrongfulness of slavery? Is that a question for Republicans? Is it to be settled by the rules of logic
and argumentation, as a matter beset with great difficulty, involving a doubtful application of the principle of justice,
hard to be understood?
What do the rhetorical questions in the excerpt suggest?
Douglass does not want to discuss slavery further
Slavery is a highly divisive and complicated issue.
Douglass is uncertain about slavery's wrongfulness.
The wrongfulness of slavery should be obvious.

explanation:

the intellectual community is a place like a university where people with high marks, or original thought or an outstanding interest in something gather. they take classes together. they discuss things. they argue sometimes, and not always in a friendly way. but if they argue, it is because they are passionate about something, and there is nothing the matter with that.

lately i've been hearing rumors that it is not the way it was when i went to school. the one thing all schools used to have was free speech. the 1st amendment rights were sacred. now i'm hearing they are not. students can be reported and disciplined for giving an off the wall opinion.

that is shameful.

intellectual ideas are meant to be discussed. they are meant to be chewed up and worked on. that is the primary responsibility of every intellectual community. if that is not the way it is, then that is not a school to go to.

social media, in my opinion, and this is just an opinion. i wouldn't take it too seriously, complicates everything to do with human communication. you can want to share things and others feel they have the right to be very critical or sarcastic or mean about what you share. lack of respect is an immeasurable intolerable condition and social media abounds with that sort of thing.

one of the things i really like about is how careful people are because they must have some idea that the mods are exactly what the word says they are. they police this board very well, and what is so remarkable about them is that they are no older than the average grade 12 student.

my hat goes off to them (which means i respect them quite a bit).

the answer is subjective. i personally agree with the first answer for this question.

if one isn't strictly talking about objects then the correct answer would be 'my eyes' since according to this riddle i am asleep and in order to answer/open the door i need to open my eyes first of all.

however, if one is specifically looking for an object, then the first thing i would open would be the door

hope this !

1. ( 3rd option ) peter gets into a fight with the musician because they will not play a happy song for him.

2. ( 2nd option) petty arguments like feuds lead to pointless tragedy .

here is what i have found for you online. that is the analysis of 14 chapter. jim’s realist interpretation of the night’s events convinces huck that avoiding dangers in the future is reasonable. this is a maturation in terms of his pragmatism, but also in his regard for jim, whose intelligence he prejudicially dismissed before.   in addition to foreshadowing huck and jim’s adventures with the duke and king, this passage provides jim’s critique of wealth as expressed in his critique of solomon: he thinks that people with little cherish what they have all the more, whereas those with surplus devalue what they have. in addition, jim here criticizes a biblical hero as being a fool on the grounds that he is not caring enough, and while jim may be missing the point he is also not entirely wrong, either. the rest can be done by the experts i know. check   prime writings for more details.