Clarice wanted to enhance her credibility with her audience, so she decided to claim that her brief summer internship had actually been a job with significantly more responsibility and that this experience made her an expert on her topic. Was Clarice following the ethical guidelines described in the reading?

No, she was not following the ethical guidelines. She simply lied to the audience by claiming she had the requisite experience even though she did not.

For her to embellish her credibility inorder to create the impression of her being an expert in the choosen topic she is speaking on is an academic fraud that should be persecuted.

Explanation:

1.   in sonnet 18, the speaker wants to describe the beauty of his love, but can’t find the words to do so. the speaker says “then in mid-utterance the lay was lost” when he tries to think of the words to describe his love’s beauty.   through his defeat of finding words to describe his love, he shows his love for her.

2.   instead of describing how perfect his love is or comparing her to other beautiful things, he says she is average and there is nothing special about her.   at the last 2 lines of the poem, the volta changes the poem by saying that even though his love is average in beauty, his love for her is special and unique. so instead of praising her throughout the whole poem, he contrasts her average characteristics with his special love for her.

3.   the beloved asked the speaker to describe how he feels about her. she begins to describe what she feels but "drop the torch" and says that she can't do it because the words "hid in me out of reach." the the speaker says "nay, let the silence of my womanhood command my woman-love to thy belief" and that her silence will have to be the answer to his question.