What do you think vonnegut means when he says that he is a "real person"? explain why

Kurt Vonnegut's letter to Mr. McCarthy about his "real" being is to show that writers such as him are not what the Chairman of the school board may think they are. This letter is a revelation or an insight into what it really is like to be a writer and get your works burned and scorned and then judged due to their contents.

Explanation:

Kurt Vonnegut, an American author and humorist wrote a letter titled "I Am Very Real" to Charles McCarthy, Chairman of the school board at Drake High School in North Dakota. This letter is in response to the burning of Vonnegut's "Slaughterhouse-Five" at the school's furnace due to its use of "obscene language".

This letter tells Mr. McCarthy how "real" Kurt himself is, stating that "books and writers are  very unreal to you people". Unlike the Chairman's notion of writers "as being sort of rat-like people who enjoy making money from poisoning the minds of  young people", they are in fact "real". And if he read their works, "educated persons would", then he will realize that the words used in the books "really don’t  damage children much". lastly, he concluded the letter with the statement "you have insulted me, and I am a good citizen, and I am very real".

Thus, when he said that he is indeed a "real person', he is showing or rather telling the chairman that writers whose works he had burned and judged based on their contents are also living humans like him and the others.

postive, comparative, superlative - good, better, best

recall how we defined nouns as words capable of having plurals and possessive endings. adjectives (and their first cousin, the adverb) also have a feature that distinguishes them. they come in three states. first, the raw adjective—in its positive state—merely describes the noun modified; it doesn’t care about how this particular person or thing stacks up against other members of the same noun class

source text: from the sketch here given it will be seen, that our good grandmothers differed considerably in their ideas of a fine figure, from their scantily dressed descendants of the present day. a fine lady, in those times, waddled under more clothes even on a fair summer's day, than would have clad the whole bevy of a modern ball room. nor were they the less admired by the gentlemen in consequence thereof. on the contrary, the greatness of a lover's passion seemed to increase in proportion to the magnitude of its object—and a voluminous damsel, arrayed in a dozen of petticoats, was declared by a low-dutch sonnetteer of the province, to be radiant as a sunflower, and luxuriant as a full blown cabbage. certain it is, that in those days, the heart of a lover could not contain more than one lady at a time; whereas the heart of a modern gallant has often room enough to accommodate half a dozen - - the reason of which i conclude to be, either that the hearts of the gentlemen have grown larger, or the persons of the ladies smaller — this however is a question for physiologists to determine. add punctuation to the following excerpt. writing under the name of diedrich knickerbocker washington irving aimed his potent satire at as diverse topics as political rivals such as thomas jefferson to the very ideal of looking back on the past affectionately: a fine lady, in those times, waddled under more clothes even on a fair summer's day, than would have clad the whole bevy of a modern ball room. a voluminous damsel, arrayed in a dozen of petticoats, was declared by a low-dutch sonnetteer of the province, to be radiant as a sunflower, and luxuriant as a full blown cabbage. in those days, the heart of a lover could not contain more than one lady at a time; whereas the heart of a modern gallant has often room enough to accommodate half a dozen