The following evidence from the article was gathered to support the idea that there are several approaches the state of Minnesota can take to protect its moose population.

1. Lowering the wolf population might reduce predation on calves, but wolves kill far more deer than moose; and as long as they are protected as a threatened species, killing them is not permitted.

2. “If I were king of the world,” said Moore of the Grand Portage Band, “I would aggressively hunt deer to the point where the population declines.”

3. In the meantime, the association is part of a $3 million project to improve moose habitat through logging to encourage patches of new forest growth and better forage. Which additional piece of evidence from the article helps to create the MOST complete argument that there are several approaches the state of Minnesota can take to protect its moose population?

(A)“Unless we want to wait 60,000 years until moose get the parasite relationship figured out.”

(B)Biologists say there are solutions, but at this point few are workable.

(C)And within the deer permit area around Grand Marais and up to Canada, current hunting rules are designed to increase deer numbers slightly.

(D)Because tamping down on the number of snails, she said, would be a much easier sell than getting rid of the deer.

article is called: Deer bringing death to Minnesota’s moose