How would delivering a speech at a political rally differ from writing an academic paper, even if both the speech and the paper were on the same subject?

A) In the paper only, one would have to consider objections to the argument made.
B) In the speech only, one would have to consider objections to the argument made.
C) In the speech, one would more likely be measured in tone; in the paper, one would more likely be animated in tone.
D) In the speech, one would more likely be animated in tone; in the paper, one would more likely be measured in tone.

Read the following passage: he roamed from chamber to chamber with hurried, unequal, and objectless step. the pallor of his countenance had assumed, if possible, a more ghastly hue— but the luminousness of his eye had utterly gone out. the once occasional huskiness of his tone was heard no more; and a tremulous quaver, as if of extreme terror, habitually characterized his utterance. there were times, indeed, when i thought his unceasingly agitated mind was laboring with some oppressive secret, to divulge which he struggled for the necessary courage. which of the above ideas might be considered foreshadowing? he is wandering all over the chamber his skin tone is really pale his voice is quivering the narrator thinks he is laboring with an oppressive secret