Which statement best describes the effect of having an unreliable narrator in
"Top of the Food Chain"?

A. It leads the reader to question his views on the subject.
B. It forces the reader to accept the narrator's opinion as fact.
C. It makes the reader more likely to believe he is an environmental
expert.
D. It helps the reader take his ideas more seriously.

I think it B because since it is an unreliable narrative, the info they are giving may be incorrect. Whick leads to the reader taking in false statements.

A. It leads the reader to question his views on the subject.

Explanation:

Just trust

onto a large boat, and mark the water level that the boat sinks to. then, take the elephant out and put a bunch of marked weights onto the boat until it reaches the same water level. add up the masses of the weights to get the weight of the elephant.

its .gov

for the pts back! merry x-mas!