Read the claim from Anna North's editorial "Why Bob Dylan Shouldn’t Have Gotten a Nobel."

Bob Dylan does not deserve the Nobel Prize in Literature.

Which sentence from the article offers a logical reason that supports the claim?

The claim is:

"He is a wonderful musician, a world-class songwriter and an enormously influential figure in American culture."

"When the Nobel committee gives the literature prize to a musician, it misses the opportunity to honor a writer."

"By honoring a musical icon, the committee members may have wanted to bring new cultural currency to the prize and make it feel relevant to a younger generation."

"Bob Dylan does not need a Nobel Prize in Literature, but literature needs a Nobel Prize."

The answer is: "When the Nobel committee gives the literature prize to a musician, it misses the opportunity to honor a writer."

Explanation:

Anna North argues that awarding a musician with an Nobel Prize in literature undermines what it means to be an author. A writer communicates through words on paper, involving much more creativity and imagination. Whereas music combines words with melodies and instruments. What she's trying to say is, music and literature appeal to different centers of the brain, the two are entirely different form of art. And, so, both should be regarded individually.

the legal limit for the drivers who can drive after consuming any amount of alcohol is 21 years.

explanation:

on november 1, 1996, a "zero tolerance law" was put into effect in the new york state.

according to this zero tolerance law, for people under the age of 21 years, it was illegal to purchase and possess alcohol or to drive after consuming any amount of it.

also, the alcohol involvement rate for the drivers under the age of 21 was roughly twice that of elderly drivers.