They are premised on different facts and different local conditions, but a common legal question justifies their consideration together in this consolidated opinion.

Based on this excerpt, The Supreme Court chose to consider the case due to

A. the wide variety of facts presented to them.
B. a legal issue shared by a number of cases.
C. the condition of schools in remote localities.
D. a concern about the treatment of citizens.

B). A Legal issue shared by a number of cases.

Explanation:

As per the question, option B i.e. 'a legal issue shared by a number of cases' would be the reason for which the supreme court must have chosen the particular case to consider. The common 'legal question' is able to justify the court's consideration despite the various facts as well as local conditions and thus, it absolutely consolidates the similar opinion which promotes the court to consider the case. Therefore, option B is the correct answer.

the legal limit for the drivers who can drive after consuming any amount of alcohol is 21 years.

explanation:

on november 1, 1996, a "zero tolerance law" was put into effect in the new york state.

according to this zero tolerance law, for people under the age of 21 years, it was illegal to purchase and possess alcohol or to drive after consuming any amount of it.

also, the alcohol involvement rate for the drivers under the age of 21 was roughly twice that of elderly drivers.

la respuesta a esta pregunta es

sinco