How reliable is this passage as a research source? A) It is not reliable. The author seems uninterested in the topic. B) It is reliable. The author seems to have a strong interest in the topic. C) It is reliable. The author includes lots of historical facts and background information about the topic. D) It is not reliable. The author relies too much on his own opinion rather than providing facts about the topic.

very interesting story but where is the question what is actually a question i don't understand

the development of trade during the middle age increased to the change given in the agriculture, which gave money, industry and markets a bigger importance in economy. the agriculture production was more than the consumption, which meant the creation of wider markets out of the areas. besides, with the end of multiple wars, the population increased and new trade routes were created.

the narrator is a first person, participant one, who describes in the simple past tense important and difficult events in his earlier life. he also provides temporal markers as the month (january) and the time (12: 30 pm). finally the account of his experience is very detailed, to the extent that a participant narrator would talk the same way about his experiences. a good example of such detail is the mention of the “bovril ration” which historically was a native american food adopted by european explorers in arctic and antarctic regions due to its high level of calories.