If learners are new to critique, we see anonymity as a scaffold to generating critical feedback. learners can practice giving feedback knowing they are not vulnerable to social repercussions. less than perfect expressions, unwarranted negative reactions, and fruitless ideas are bound to be part of novice feedback, but teachers hope to create learning configurations that support both the giver and the receiver of feedback, especially if the commenters are novices. references: howard, c. d., barrett, a. f., & frick, t. w. (2010). anonymity to promote peer feedback: pre-service teachers' comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. journal of educational computing research, 43(1), 89-112. if providing peer feedback is a skill to be learned then perhaps it is advisable to give learners opportunities to practice giving feedback knowing they are not vulnerable to social repercussions. in this way, anonymity can act "as a scaffold to generating critical feedback" (howard, barrett, & frick, 2010, p. 104). references: howard, c. d., barrett, a. f., & frick, t. w. (2010). anonymity to promote peer feedback: pre-service teachers' comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. journal of educational computing research, 43(1), 89-112. which of the following is true for the student version above? word-for-word plagiarism paraphrasing plagiarism this is not plagiarism

The true option is "This is not plagiarism"

Explanation:

It is very common when we are making reference to a material written previously to cross that thin line that divides paraphrasing from Plagiarism, to avoid committing the serious offense of plagiarising others work, people have to re-write the information with their own words, this is an example of paraphrasing without plagiarism since it keeps the same idea but with a different writing style.

yti<

sdacdsvdfvv

explanation:

v/zdjvmxv

"the monkey's paw" is a rare story in that the theme is actually stated in the story. sgt. maj. morris tells the whites that the old fakir who put the spell on the paw said, "fate rules people's lives and those who interfere with fate do so to their sorrow." the message is a warning, but mr. white doesn't believe it. even though sgt. maj. morris makes it clear that he tried wishing with unfortunate results and he tries to throw the paw on the fire,   mr. white makes a wish for 200 pounds only to find that he receives the money when herbert dies in a factory accident. according to the fakir, then, because mr. white had wished for something he should not have had, his son lost his life.

the second wish that mrs. white encourages him to make is for herbert's return--one week after his death. when the strange knocking begins at the door during the windy night, mr. white panicks, believing that the previously dead but still mangled herbert could have walked home from the cemetary and is now at the door. because he fears what his wife will find if she opens the door, mr. white makes his third wish--for the noise to stop.

therefore, he uses his three wishes and to his sorrow, loses his son and disappoints his wife, who fervently believed that their son was at the door. she wanted him back, regardless of his condition.

explanation: