Why is the cornell method a more effective note-taking method than the mapping, charting, and outlining methods when reading textbook material?

Explanation:

The best thing about the Cornell method of taking notes is the fact that it involves an analysis of the material, which helps you remember it and understand it better.

The mapping method is good for diving the material and visually making a clearer picture, but it does not summarize text or questions very well.

Charting is also good for categorizing text, especially if it involved facts that have to be learned by fact. But this method also doesn't give much space for questions, explanations or highlight points.

The outline method is maybe the best when taking notes, but it is very linear and not too visually or structurally organized.

Cornell method is great for textbook material because you can easily go through a summary of the text in the main part, but then you have to analyze it and review it too put highlights in the down part of the structure. In this way, you will learn things better and remember them more easily.

Also, when you go back to the notes to review them, you will have the main highlight very visible. On the left side, you can put keywords and questions separately and in that way, they are not mixed with the rest of the summary.

This method is greatest for text because it is easy for analysis, good for learning, visually appealing and helpful when reviewing the notes afterward.

i think the answer is b