How does hearing about gatsby through the point of view of his guests impact the readers view of gatsby and his guests?

It becomes obvious for the readers that Gatsby's guests like to spread gossips about him, but the readers do not take those rumors so seriously.

Explanation:

Although people attend Gatsby's parties, they often spread rumors about him. His guests discuss the means of acquiring his wealth, often implying that Gatsby is a criminal. In Chapter II, Myrtle and her sister mention that rumor has it that Gatsby got his money from Kaiser Wilhelm, who is his relative. This makes Gatsby suspicious and dangerous in the eyes of a reader, implying that he is hiding something. In this light, when Gatsby is shot and killed by George Wilson, his guests probably believe that this is what he deserves. However, as for the readers, they are probably not convinced that easily that Gatsby is a negative character. Despite the rumors, they recognize his unconditional love for Daisy and his generosity, which makes it unlikely that he is engaged in criminal activities.

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

the message which is being conveyed is that if a person does not have the qualified skills to be an writer then he should not and if he becomes then just leave it away..

i think this is it plz check